pc build – Page 2 – No Better Tech

How to buy a 4K/8K Video Editing PC

Note: Before you buy anything, consider making a search for similar online e-shops, to compare Pricing, Warranty, and Total Costs [+ VAT + Import Tax + Shipping] to read Reviews, and Confirm the purchased item e.g. hardware PC, meets the Recommended [Not-Minimum Requirements, to be your Purchase Future Proof] Requirements of the Software you will be using… e.g.

helpx.adobe.com [premiere-pro/system-requirements.html]

https://helpx.adobe.com/cy_en/premiere-pro/system-requirements.html

Your computer must meet the minimum technical specifications outlined below to run Adobe Premiere Pro. For optimum performance, use recommended system specifications.

Applicable for:

Premiere Pro version 24.0. View previous [2023] system requirements: here.

System requirements [2024] for Premiere Pro:

Minimum and recommended system requirements for Windows

Minimum and recommended system requirements for macOS

Note:

Minimum specifications are for editing HD video. Recommended specifications are for editing video HD, 4K, or higher resolutions.

From <https://helpx.adobe.com/premiere-pro/system-requirements.html>

Title–1: “Choosing the Perfect Workstation for 4K Video Editing with Premiere Pro 2024”

In the fast-evolving realm of video editing, where 4K content has become the new standard, selecting the right workstation is crucial. Adobe Premiere Pro 2024 demands robust hardware to unleash its full potential. In this guide, we’ll explore the key factors to consider when purchasing a workstation tailored for 4K video editing, specifically optimized for Adobe Premiere Pro 2024.

1. Processor Power: Premiere Pro thrives on a potent processor, and for 4K editing, you need nothing short of a powerhouse. Aim for a multi-core processor with high clock speeds, like Intel’s i9 or AMD’s Ryzen 9 series, to handle the immense data processing demands of 4K video rendering.

2. Graphics Card (GPU): The GPU is the unsung hero of video editing. Adobe applications, especially Premiere Pro, heavily rely on GPU acceleration. Invest in a top-tier graphics card, such as NVIDIA’s RTX series or AMD’s Radeon Pro, to ensure seamless playback and real-time editing of 4K footage.

3. RAM Requirements: Video editing is notorious for being a memory-intensive task. Opt for at least 32GB of RAM, but if your budget allows, consider pushing it to 64GB or more. This ensures smooth multitasking and minimizes the risk of bottlenecks during complex editing sessions.

4. Storage Solutions: High-resolution video files demand ample storage space and rapid data transfer rates. Invest in a combination of SSDs for the OS and applications and high-capacity HDDs for storing raw footage. NVMe SSDs provide lightning-fast read and write speeds, significantly improving project loading times.

5. Display Considerations: A high-quality, color-accurate monitor is crucial for video editing. Choose a 4K monitor with HDR support for accurate color grading. Additionally, consider a dual-monitor setup for enhanced workflow efficiency.

6. Connectivity and Ports: Ensure your workstation has a variety of ports for external devices such as cameras, storage drives, and audio interfaces. USB-C, Thunderbolt, and SD card slots are essential for seamless data transfer.

7. Cooling Solutions: The processing power required for 4K editing generates a significant amount of heat. Invest in a workstation with efficient cooling solutions, such as liquid cooling, to maintain optimal performance and prevent thermal throttling.

8. Future-Proofing: Technology evolves rapidly, and your workstation should be equipped to handle future advancements. Choose a motherboard that supports future upgrades, ensuring your investment lasts for years to come.

9. Budget Allocation: Building the perfect workstation involves finding the right balance between performance and budget. Prioritize components like CPU, GPU, and RAM, as these directly impact editing performance. Allocate resources wisely based on your specific needs and budget constraints.

10. Reviews and Recommendations: Before making a final decision, read reviews and seek recommendations from fellow video editors. Online communities, forums, and professional reviews can provide valuable insights into the real-world performance of different workstation configurations.

In conclusion, investing in a workstation for 4K video editing with Adobe Premiere Pro 2024 is a nuanced process. By considering the processor, GPU, RAM, storage, display, connectivity, cooling, future-proofing, budget allocation, and gathering insights from reviews, you can tailor a system that meets your editing demands and propels your creative projects to new heights. Happy editing!

Title–2: “A Guide to Choosing the Ideal 8K Video Editing, Workstation for Adobe Premiere Pro 2024 and DaVinci Resolve 18.5”

In the dynamic landscape of video editing, the demand for 8K content creation is on the rise. Whether you’re a professional video editor working with Adobe Premiere Pro 2024 or DaVinci Resolve 18.5, selecting the right workstation is paramount. This guide will navigate you through the crucial considerations when purchasing a workstation tailored for the intensive requirements of 8K video editing.

1. Processor Dominance: The heart of your workstation, the processor, should be a juggernaut. Opt for high-core-count CPUs like Intel’s Core i9 or AMD’s Ryzen 9 series to handle the immense data crunching needed for editing 8K footage.

2. Graphics Powerhouse (GPU): Both Premiere Pro and DaVinci Resolve heavily rely on GPU acceleration. Invest in a top-tier graphics card, such as NVIDIA’s RTX series or AMD’s Radeon Pro, with ample VRAM to facilitate real-time editing, color grading, and rendering of 8K content.

3. Mammoth RAM Requirements: Video editing at 8K demands a substantial amount of memory. Aim for a minimum of 64GB of RAM to ensure smooth playback and efficient handling of large video files. If your budget permits, consider going even higher to 128GB for optimal performance.

4. Storage Speed and Capacity: 8K video files are massive, and your storage solution needs to match. Opt for NVMe SSDs with high read and write speeds for the OS, applications, and project files. Complement this with large-capacity HDDs for storing raw 8K footage.

5. Color-Accurate Displays: A high-quality monitor with accurate color representation is indispensable for 8K video editing. Choose a 4K or 8K display with HDR support to ensure precise color grading in both Premiere Pro and DaVinci Resolve.

6. Connectivity Galore: A plethora of ports is essential for seamless connectivity with external devices. Ensure your workstation has USB-C, Thunderbolt, and various card slots to accommodate the diverse range of peripherals used in professional video editing.

7. Cooling Solutions for Sustained Performance: The processing power required for 8K editing generates substantial heat. Select a workstation with efficient cooling solutions, such as liquid cooling, to maintain peak performance during prolonged editing sessions.

8. Future-Proofing Investments: 8K video editing is at the forefront of content creation, and technology is ever-evolving. Choose a motherboard that supports future CPU and GPU upgrades to keep your workstation relevant as technology advances.

9. Budgeting Wisely: Building a workstation for 8K video editing involves strategic budget allocation. Prioritize components like CPU, GPU, and RAM, as these directly impact editing performance. Balance your budget while ensuring each component meets the demands of 8K content creation.

10. Software Compatibility: Both Adobe Premiere Pro 2024 and DaVinci Resolve 18.5 have specific hardware requirements. Check their official documentation for compatibility, ensuring your chosen components align with the recommended specifications for optimal performance.

In summary, unlocking the full potential of 8K video editing with Adobe Premiere Pro 2024 or DaVinci Resolve 18.5 requires a well-thought-out workstation. By carefully considering the processor, GPU, RAM, storage, display, connectivity, cooling, future-proofing, budgeting, and software compatibility, you can assemble a powerhouse that elevates your 8K editing experience to new heights. Happy editing!

Note: Similar Software e.g., Adobe Premiere Pro vs. DaVinci Resolve — may have different requirements, so you must search for it … e.g., Software-A uses Graphics Card more, while Software-B may use Processor more…

https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/products/davinciresolve

Two Great Versions

DaVinci Resolve

DaVinci Resolve is the world’s only all-in-one solution for editing, color, VFX, motion graphics, and audio! The free version works with virtually all 8‑bit video formats at up to 60fps in resolutions as high as Ultra HD 3840 x 2160. The free version includes multi-user collaboration and HDR grading!

Free Download Now

DaVinci Resolve Studio

Includes everything in the free version plus the DaVinci Neural Engine, dozens of additional Resolve FX, temporal and spatial noise reduction, stereoscopic 3D, film grain, optical blur and mist effects, and more. It also supports 10‑bit video at up to 120 frames per second and resolutions beyond 4K.

Buy Online Now $295

https://helpx.adobe.com/cy_en/premiere-pro/system-requirements.html

Your computer must meet the minimum technical specifications outlined below to run Adobe Premiere Pro 24.0/2024. For optimum performance, use recommended system specifications.

Minimum and recommended system requirements for Windows

	Minimum	Recommended
Processor	Intel® 6th Generation or newer CPU – or AMD Ryzen™ 1000 Series or newer CPU Advanced Vector Extensions 2 (AVX2) Support required Note: it is not possible to install the 24.0 versions on Intel® 3rd Generation of processors or older (as well as older AMD processors).	Intel® 11th Generation or newer CPU with Quick Sync – or AMD Ryzen™ 3000 Series / Threadripper 2000 series or newer CPU
Operating system	Windows 10 (64-bit) V20H2 or later	Windows 10 (64-bit) version 22H2 (or later) or Windows 11.
Memory	8 GB of RAM	16 GB of RAM for HD media32 GB or more for 4K and higher
GPU	2 GB of GPU memory	4 GB of GPU memory for HD and some 4K media6 GB or more for 4K and higher
Storage	8 GB of available hard disk space for installation; additional free space required during installation (will not install on removable flash storage)Additional high-speed drive for media	Fast internal SSD for app installation and cache additional high-speed drive(s) for media
Display	1920 x 1080	1920 x 1080 or greaterDisplayHDR 1000 for HDR workflows
Sound card	ASIO compatible or Microsoft Windows Driver Model	ASIO compatible or Microsoft Windows Driver Model
Network storage connection		1 Gigabit Ethernet (HD only) 10 Gigabit ethernet for 4K shared network workflow

IBM Compatible vs Mac Clones; The nostalgic era of legal Mac Clones Computers, the era without the Apple Computer monopoly; This has been just a few years before the turn of the century, between 1995-1999

It was, the magazine PC-KYPRIAKO a Cyprus 🇨🇾 magazine for computers in Greek I started to read at the age of 14 years old from 1989-1990… learned my first computer experience, but without a PC, only by reading this Journal. Later in 1992, I got my first PC, an IBM-compatible MS-DOS Computer, 80386/i386, I think without a mouse!!! (since MS-DOS OS and Not MS-Windows OS). Two years later I upgraded the RAM & the OS to Windows 3.1 and started on Windows Office and Draw Apps like Word, Excel, and CorelDraw. I got a ballpoint mouse too.

In the mid-1990s, the personal computer market was dominated by IBM-compatible machines, but there was also a small but thriving market for Macintosh clones. These were computers that were legally licensed to run Apple’s operating system, from 1995+ but were made by third-party manufacturers instead of Apple itself. This was a unique period in the history of personal computing, and it’s worth taking a closer look at how it all came about.

In the early days of personal computing, Apple was one of the most innovative and successful companies in the industry. The original Macintosh, released in 1984, was a groundbreaking machine that set the standard for user-friendly graphical user interfaces. However, despite its initial success, Apple soon found itself struggling to compete with the much larger IBM-compatible market. By the early 1990s, Macintosh sales had stagnated, and the company was in danger of being marginalized.

To boost sales and increase market share, Apple decided to license its operating system to third-party manufacturers. This was a bold move, as it meant giving up some control over the hardware and software ecosystem that had made Apple successful in the first place. However, the hope was that by expanding the market for Macintosh-compatible machines, Apple could regain its position as a major player in the personal computing world.

The first company to take advantage of Apple’s licensing program was a company called Power Computing, which released its first Macintosh clone in 1995. The Power Macintosh line of computers was a huge success, offering consumers a wider range of choices at lower prices than Apple’s machines. Other companies soon followed suit, including UMAX, Motorola, and DayStar Digital.

At the time, many people thought that the Mac clone market was the future of personal computing. Apple’s market share was still relatively small, and the clones seemed like a viable way to expand the Macintosh ecosystem. However, things didn’t quite work out that way. Although the clones were popular among consumers, they were not successful enough to bring Apple back to dominance. They may have hurt the company more than they helped it.

One of the biggest problems with the Mac clone market was that it created a fragmented hardware and software ecosystem. Because there were so many different manufacturers making different types of Macintosh-compatible machines, software developers had a hard time creating software that would work reliably across all of them. This meant that the Macintosh ecosystem became much less attractive to developers, who were already more focused on the larger IBM-compatible market.

Another problem was that the Mac clones were often seen as inferior to Apple’s machines. Although they were cheaper, they were also less reliable and less well-designed. This meant that even Mac users often preferred to stick with Apple’s machines, rather than switch to a clone.

In the end, the Mac clone market was short-lived. By the late 1990s, Apple had regained some of its momentum with the release of the iMac and other popular machines. At the same time, the market for IBM-compatible machines was starting to shrink, as consumers began to shift their focus to newer devices like smartphones and tablets.

Looking back on this era, it’s clear that the Mac clone market was an interesting experiment in the history of personal computing. Although it didn’t succeed, it showed that there was a demand for a wider range of hardware options in the Macintosh ecosystem. And who knows – if things had gone differently, we might be living in a world today where Mac clones are just as common as IBM-compatible machines.

MacOS Alternatives in History & Now:

Mac Clones Computers 🖥️ [1995 – 1999]

The hardware had Apple hardware Specifications and ran MacOS.

Mac Hackintosh Computers 🖥️ [200X – 2023]

Hardware has IBM/Windows Specifications (Not all hardware is compatible with this process*, you have e.g. built a PC in the case with compatible parts like Intel processor, etc. AMD usually does not work) but runs MacOS.

MacOS VMs on MacOS using VMware, VirtualBox, or Parallels** 🖥️ [200X – 2023]

Hardware Apple Mac, host MacOS, running Guest MacOS isolated OS.

MacOS VMs on Windows or Linux using VMware, or Virtual Box*** 🖥️ [2006 – 2023]

Hardware IBM/Windows, host Windows 10/11 OS, running Guest MacOS isolated OS.

————notes————

* You must do your research for hardware compatibility.

** You must get a good Mac, as VMs usually need additional hardware resources like RAM over +16GB and an Intel processor over +4 cores.

*** You must do your research again for hardware compatibility, and get a good PC, as VMs usually need additional hardware resources like RAM over +16GB and an Intel processor over +4 cores.

————links————

The Macintosh Clones

https://everymac.com/systems/mac-clones/index-mac-clones.html

https://hackintosh.com/

Virtualization on a Mac (Apple.com)

https://www.makeuseof.com/tag/macos-windows-10-virtual-machine/

The advantage of getting Hardware & OS Software from the same manufacturer E.g. Apple Mac/macOS

The advantage of getting Hardware & OS Software from the same manufacturer: Like Apple* Mac & MacOS or Microsoft PC & Microsoft Windows OS

Note: *Apple now does its own Apple Mac Silicon Processors unlike MS hardware the processors are Intel/AMD.

Getting hardware & software from the same manufacturer once was, go only with Apple Computer 🖥, however, nowadays you have other options like Microsoft Computer, Google Computer, and Tuxedo Linux Computer/TuxedoOS or System76/Pop!OS Linux Computer, the two latter with their own Linux Distributions OSs, …

Note: Other’s options exist, but as of this writing, only these have come to my eyes on the web, Google, YouTube…etc. [hint look here: https://kde.org/hardware/]

When it comes to technology, the relationship between hardware and software is crucial. The hardware refers to the physical components of a device, such as the computer itself, while the software is the operating system (OS) that runs on that hardware, enabling it to perform various tasks. In the tech world, there are two prominent players that offer both hardware and software – Apple and Microsoft. Let’s explore the advantages of getting hardware and software from the same manufacturer, using examples of Apple Mac and macOS or Microsoft PC and Microsoft Windows OS.

Seamless Integration

One of the key advantages of getting hardware and software from the same manufacturer is the seamless integration between the two. When the hardware and software are designed to work together, it results in a smoother and more efficient user experience. For instance, Apple’s macOS is specifically developed to run on its Mac hardware, which allows for seamless integration and optimization of performance. This results in a stable and reliable operating system that is designed to work in perfect harmony with the hardware it runs on. The same holds true for Microsoft’s PC hardware and Windows OS.

Enhanced Performance

Hardware and software that are designed to complement each other can deliver enhanced performance. When the manufacturer has control over both the hardware and software components, they can optimize them to work seamlessly together, resulting in improved performance and efficiency. This is especially noticeable in the case of Apple’s Mac and macOS ecosystem, where Apple can fine-tune both the hardware and software components to deliver exceptional performance and user experience. Microsoft also follows a similar approach with its PC hardware and Windows OS, aiming to provide a cohesive experience to its users.

Better User Experience

Using hardware and software from the same manufacturer often results in a better user experience. With integrated hardware and software, users can enjoy a consistent and unified experience across their devices. The user interface, design elements, and functionalities are designed to work in tandem, providing a cohesive and familiar experience for users. This can simplify tasks, reduce learning curves, and enhance overall usability. For example, Apple’s Mac and macOS offer a seamless experience with features such as Handoff, Continuity, and iCloud integration, allowing users to seamlessly switch between their Mac, iPhone, and iPad, enhancing productivity and convenience.

Reliable Support and Updates

Getting hardware and software from the same manufacturer can also result in reliable support and updates. When the same company develops the hardware and software, it can provide more efficient customer support and regular updates. This is because the manufacturer has full control over both the hardware and software components and can quickly diagnose and resolve any issues that may arise. Additionally, software updates can be designed specifically to work with the hardware, ensuring compatibility and stability. This is evident in both Apple’s Mac and macOS ecosystem and Microsoft’s PC and Windows OS, where users can expect regular updates and reliable support.

Enhanced Security

Security is a critical aspect of any technological ecosystem. When hardware and software are developed by the same manufacturer, it allows for tighter integration and security measures. The manufacturer can design the hardware and software components to work in tandem to provide enhanced security features, such as secure boot, firmware-level encryption, and hardware-based security features. This results in a more secure ecosystem for users. For example, Apple’s Mac and macOS ecosystems are known for their robust security features, such as Gatekeeper, File Vault, and Touch ID, providing users with peace of mind when it comes to data security. Microsoft also offers a range of security features in its PC hardware and Windows OS, such as Windows Defender, BitLocker, and Windows Hello, to ensure the security of its users.

Advantages

In conclusion, getting hardware and software from the same manufacturer, such as Apple Mac and macOS or Microsoft PC and Windows OS, offers several advantages. The seamless integration of hardware and software results in improved performance, enhanced user experience, reliable support and updates, and enhanced security. When the manufacturer has control over both the hardware and software components, they can optimize them to work together, resulting in a cohesive ecosystem that provides a consistent and familiar user experience. Additionally, having hardware and software from the same manufacturer allows for more efficient customer support and regular updates, as well as enhanced security features.

Disadvantages

However, it’s important to note that this approach also has some limitations. It may limit the choices and flexibility for users who prefer to mix and match different hardware and software components. It may also result in a higher price point, as the manufacturer may have a premium for their integrated ecosystem. Moreover, it may limit compatibility with third-party hardware or software, as the manufacturer may prioritize their own products.

The decision to get hardware and software from the same manufacturer depends on the preferences and needs of the individual user. Some users may prioritize the seamless integration, enhanced performance, and user experience offered by an integrated ecosystem, while others may prioritize flexibility and compatibility with various hardware and software components. It’s essential to consider the specific requirements and preferences when deciding and choosing the option that best aligns with those needs.

Final Thoughts

In conclusion, the advantage of getting hardware and software from the same manufacturer, such as Apple Mac/macOS or Microsoft PC/Windows, lies in the seamless integration, enhanced performance, better user experience, reliable support and updates, and enhanced security features. However, it’s important to carefully consider individual preferences and requirements before deciding. Whether one chooses an integrated ecosystem or a mix-and-match approach, it’s crucial to ensure that the hardware and software components work together efficiently to meet one’s needs and expectations.

Hope this helped… Do your homework & research! …and you will better spend your hard-earned money.